* Check git version before attempting to disable `sparse-checkout`
* Bump `MinimumGitSparseCheckoutVersion` to 2.28 due to #1386
* Initial prep for release 4.1.3
When a worktree is reused by actions/checkout and the first time sparse checkout was enabled, we need to ensure that the second time it is only a sparse checkout if explicitly asked for. Otherwise, we need to disable the sparse checkout so that a full checkout is the outcome of this Action.
## Details
* If no `sparse-checkout` parameter is specified, disable it
This should allow users to reuse existing folders when running
`actions/checkout` where a previous run asked for a sparse checkout but
the current run does not ask for a sparse checkout.
This fixes https://github.com/actions/checkout/issues/1475
There are use cases in particular with non-ephemeral (self-hosted) runners where an
existing worktree (that has been initialized as a sparse checkout) is
reused in subsequent CI runs (where `actions/checkout` is run _without_
any `sparse-checkout` parameter).
In these scenarios, we need to make sure that the sparse checkout is
disabled before checking out the files.
### Also includes:
* npm run build
* ci: verify that an existing sparse checkout can be made unsparse
* Added a clarifying comment about test branches.
* `test-proxy` now uses newly-minted `test-ubuntu-git` container image from ghcr.io
---------
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Co-authored-by: John Wesley Walker III <81404201+jww3@users.noreply.github.com>
Setting the `show-progress` option to false in the `with` section of the
workflow step will cause git fetch to run without `--progress`.
The motivation is to be able to suppress the noisy progress status
output which adds many hundreds of "remote: Counting objects: 85%
(386/453)" and similar lines in the workflow log.
This should be sufficient to resolve#894 and its older friends,
though the solution is different to the one proposed there because
it doesn't use the --quiet flag. IIUC git doesn't show the progress
status by default since the output is not a terminal, so that's why
removing the --progress option is all that's needed.
Adding the --quiet flag doesn't make a lot of difference once the
--progress flag is removed, and actually I think using --quiet would
suppress some other more useful output that would be better left
visible.
Signed-off-by: Simon Baird <sbaird@redhat.com>
* Add support for sparse checkouts
* sparse-checkout: optionally turn off cone mode
While it _is_ true that cone mode is the default nowadays (mainly for
performance reasons: code mode is much faster than non-cone mode), there
_are_ legitimate use cases where non-cone mode is really useful.
Let's add a flag to optionally disable cone mode.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
* Verify minimum Git version for sparse checkout
The `git sparse-checkout` command is available only since Git version
v2.25.0. The `actions/checkout` Action actually supports older Git
versions than that; As of time of writing, the minimum version is
v2.18.0.
Instead of raising this minimum version even for users who do not
require a sparse checkout, only check for this minimum version
specifically when a sparse checkout was asked for.
Suggested-by: Tingluo Huang <tingluohuang@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
* Support sparse checkout/LFS better
Instead of fetching all the LFS objects present in the current revision
in a sparse checkout, whether they are needed inside the sparse cone or
not, let's instead only pull the ones that are actually needed.
To do that, let's avoid running that preemptive `git lfs fetch` call in
case of a sparse checkout.
An alternative that was considered during the development of this patch
(and ultimately rejected) was to use `git lfs pull --include <path>...`,
but it turned out to be too inflexible because it requires exact paths,
not the patterns that are available via the sparse checkout definition,
and that risks running into command-line length limitations.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
---------
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Co-authored-by: Daniel <daniel.fernandez@feverup.com>
* Fix Self hosted runner issue wrt bad submodules - solution cleanup working space.
* Fix format with npm run format output
* Add mock implementation for new function submoduleStatus
* Add 2 test cases for submodule status.
* Codeql-Action Analyse revert v1 to v2
---------
Co-authored-by: Bassem Dghaidi <568794+Link-@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: sminnie <minnie@sankhe.com>
When trying to list local branches to figure out what needs cleaned up during runs on non-ephemeral Actions Runners, we use git rev-parse --symbolic-full-name to get a list of branches. This can lead to ambiguous ref name errors when there are branches and tags with similar names.
Part of the reason we use rev-parse --symbolic-full-name vs git branch --list or git rev-parse --symbolic seems to related to a bug in Git 2.18. Until we can deprecate our usage of Git 2.18, I think we need to keep --symbolic-full-name. Since part of the problem is that these ambiguous ref name errors clog the Actions annotation limits, this is a mitigation to suppress those messages until we can get rid of the workaround.
Checking out certain `ref` values will result in a warning about a detached `HEAD`:
```
You are in 'detached HEAD' state. You can look around, make experimental
changes and commit them, and you can discard any commits you make in this
state without impacting any branches by switching back to a branch.
If you want to create a new branch to retain commits you create, you may
do so (now or later) by using -c with the switch command. Example:
git switch -c <new-branch-name>
Or undo this operation with:
git switch -
Turn off this advice by setting config variable advice.detachedHead to false
```
However, this warning isn't useful in a CI environment... so suppress it.
I realize on the original bug report that one user mentioned this warning
highlighted a bug in his actions flow, but I consider that a super rare / happy accident.
99% of use cases will be _intentionally_ checking out a specific ref where
the detached head state is inevitable, so the warning is pure noise.
Passing the config this way sets it _only_ for this command. Note that it
must be set [_before_ calling `checkout`](https://stackoverflow.com/a/72588008/770425).
Resolve: https://github.com/actions/checkout/issues/494
